|
2006 |
K-MADe : un environnement pour le noyau du modèle de description de l’activité Baron, M. Lucquiaud, V. Autard, D. et Scapin, DL. K-MADe : un environement pour le noyau du modèle de description de l'activité. Proceedings of the 18th French-speaking conference on Human-computer interaction, Montreal, Canada, April 18-21 2006. |
|
2005 |
Proposition d'un noyau et d'une structure pour les modèles de tâches orientés utilisateurs Lucquiaud, V. Proposition d'un noyau et d'une structure pour les modèles de tâches orientés utilisateurs.Proceedings of the 17th French-speaking conference on Human-computer interaction, Toulouse, France, September 27-30 2005, p. 83-90. |
|
2002 |
Outils de modélisation des tâches utilisateurs : exigences du point de vue utilisation Lucquiaud, V. Scapin, Dominique. Jambon, Francis. Outils de modélisation des tâches utilisateurs : exigences du point de vue utilisation. Proceedings of the 14th French-speaking conference on Human-computer interaction, Poitiers, France, November 26-29 2002, p. 243-246. |
The initial work concerning task modelling for user interfaces (Scapin,
1988) had several objectives: to consider the way in which users
represents their task, not the logic of the data-processing, or the
“prescribed” task; to take into account the
conceptual and semantic aspects, not only syntactic and lexical
aspects; to obtain a structuring of the tasks in a uniform way; to
carry out descriptions from a declarative point of view (state of
things) as well as procedural (way of reaching these states); to allow
parallelism and not only sequential representation(synchronization of
the tasks); and to be computable.
From these first ideas and various requirements, a first task analysis model (“MAD”: Méthode Analytique de Description) was proposed (Scapin, D.L. & Pierret-Golbreich, C., 1989, 1990) at the intersection of ergonomics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Moreover, the tool EMAD was developed (Pierret, C., Delouis, I. & Scapin, D.L., 1989); Delouis I., Pierret C., 1991).
In parallel, a method for task information gathering was defined (Sebillotte S., 1991); it consists mainly of semi-directed interviews based on the “Why?” “How?” technique. Also, one practical methodology of task analysis for extracting the relevant characteristics useful for the design of interfaces was also proposed (Sebillotte, S. & Scapin, D.L., 1994).
Since then the work has been continued according to an iterative process: development; for example: implementation of the model in an object oriented fashion, organization of the tasks at various levels of abstraction, validation in the field (house automation, management of ship fires, air traffic control, railway regulation, etc), modifications, validations again (further references are available upon request).
Research work (Gamboa-Rodriguez, F. & Scapin, D.L., 1997) also focused on the design and specification of interfaces. Two models were designed: a task model (MAD *) and a model for conceptual interface design (ICS), as well as procedures for moving from one model to the other, and links with the low level interface aspects (via the toolbox ILOG-Views). The work led to the implementation of the task analysis editor EMAD * and to a software design environment (ALACIE).